Analyse and assess the key issues in managing conflict within the Essay

Analyse and assess the key issues in managing conflict within the workplace, with special regard to the relative decline in indu - Essay Example Either of these will be used depending on the scenario at hand, which is a task befalling HR managers, as they must correctly assess the scenario and identify which conflict management style would be effective. From a broader perspective, HR professionals should look to equipping their workforce with not only technical skills but also intercultural and interpersonal skills to enable them deal with the rising pressure (Trudel and Reio 2011, p.395). Conflicts at the workplace are inevitable and need not be feared as non-existence of them indicates unhealthy work relationships. The focus should be on making the conflicts constructive as constructive conflicts are characterized by increased cooperation, stronger relationships, improved outcome quality, being mostly cognitive and separating the person from the problem. Therefore, managers should look to proper handling of conflicts rather than eliminating them all together so as to reap these benefits. The primary tool of handling conflic ts is communication, according to the communication systems approach, where conflicts are seen to be a result of failed or poor communication between the conflicting parties. There are elements within communication systems established in an organization, where the elements are the parties communicating, medium being used and messages being sent and/or received. When these elements are interconnected, the communication systems adopted may trigger the process of conflict. Hence, managers are urged to set up proper communication systems to ensure that where conflicts arise, they are constructive (Collins 2008, p.6). Following the communication systems approach, conflicts are viewed as episodes that occur during the process of communication. These episodes come about when the aforementioned elements interconnect and subsequently all the elements affect the conflict process and its outcomes. In addition, according to this approach, the conflict process arises in two contexts- physical an d psychological, where the former refers to the attributes of the actual physical environment such as the size of the room, noise in the surrounding area and how furniture is arranged within the room. The latter refers to culture of an organization that determines how communication will take place; both these contexts affect the way in which the sender constructs the message and the way the recipient interprets it (Collins 2008, p.6). Regardless of the approach to be adopted, HR should understand that failure to properly handle conflicts within the workplace increases the level along with frequency of future conflicts. This goes on to affect productivity, job performance and employee learning. Closely linked to conflict management styles is workplace incivility as it is seen to determine the outcome. Workplace incivility refers to individual responses to certain scenarios that are brought about by negative actions. These responses may be counterproductive and as such should be monit ored to avoid further escalation and repeat of workplace conflicts. When dealing with conflicts it is important to look into the instigators together with the targets of deviant behaviour; and also consider that deviant behaviour could be a trigger, cause or outcome of workplace conflicts. Additional exchanges as a result of deviant behaviour create a conflict spiral where a conflict will be seen to escalate and possibly spread to ‘

Personal Work Group Evaluation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Personal Work Group Evaluation - Assignment Example The goal of the group was to select three subjects with which the program should be launched and how many questions should be asked in a single set. The group is also expected to suggest other features that would make this service attractive for the students. The group membership consists of four members: two school textbook editors, an IT specialist, and a finance expert from the same organization. The group started off on a positive note since the people knew one another from the organization but, except for the two editors, had not worked together on a project before. During the forming stage, the members met in a conference room and exchanged greetings. The IT specialist introduced the project and asked the textbook editors to suggest which subjects should be selected. The group then seemed to enter the storming stage as the editors disagreed on several issues. One editor wanted to select high school science subjects whereas the other editor stressed on using English questions for ESL and EFL students. They interrupted each other frequently and ultimately, the other two members had been left out of the discussion and it became a tussle between the two editors. Eventually, the IT specialist noted that decisions could not be made in this way and that it was necessary to establish some norms. He suggested that each member would share their ideas along with the pros and cons so that a balanced discussion can take place. He also suggested that in the end a vote would be taken to decide which subjects to select. The members agreed that they needed more time to research about the size of the market and the pros and cons of their choices. The meeting was adjourned on this note. During the proceedings, the two editors engaged in turf protection and in establishing their authority over each other. They shared ideas but merely to reject competing ones. The IT